• English
  • Nederlands
HOME
ZOEK
CONTACT
NIEUWSBRIEF
 
 
 
INHOUD
Over ons
Over NAF
Bijdragen
Artikeloproep
De CIO spreekt
De Architect antwoordt
De Business bepaalt
Proceedings
Blogs
Scripties
Kalender
Links
Login/Registreer
THEMAS
Effect van architectuur
SOA
BPM
Methoden
Architectuurprincipes
Financiële sector
Overheidssector
Zorg sector
Externe bronnen
Advertenties
Zoek je een baan?
Zoek je hulp?
Zoek je een opleiding?
Zoek je een tool?


Logica
logo_5fsap.jpg 

 
 
Class Diagrams and Use Cases - Experimental Examination of the Preferred Order of Modeling
Peretz Shoval, Avi Yampolsky, Mark Last   
maandag, 05 juni 2006
In most UML-based methodologies, the analysis tasks include mainly modeling the functional requirements using use cases, and modeling the problem domain using a class diagram. Different methodologies prescribe different orders of carrying out these tasks, and there is no commonly agreed order for performing them. In order to find out whether the order of these analysis activities makes any difference, and which order leads to better results, we carried out a comparative experiment. Subjects were asked to create the two analysis models for a certain system in two opposite orders, and the qualities of the produced models were then compared. The results of the experiment reveal that the class diagram is of better quality when created as the first modeling task, while no significant effect of the analysis order was found on the quality of the use cases. We also found out that analysts prefer starting the analysis with data modeling.

[PDF] [Slides in PDF] [BibteX]