• English
  • Nederlands
HOME
SEARCH
CONTACT
NEWSLETTER
 
 
 
CONTENT
About us
About NAF
Contributions
Call for contribution
The CIO speaks
The Architect answers
The Business decides
Proceedings
Blogs
Master thesis
Events calendar
Links
Login/Register
THEMES
Effect of architecture
SOA
BPM
Methods
Principles
Financial services
Public sector
Health sector
advertisements
Zoek je een baan?
Zoek je hulp?
Zoek je een opleiding?
Zoek je een tool?


Logica
logo_5fsap.jpg 

 
 
BLOGS
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name:
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question
Written by Joost de Vries on 31-01-2008 19:35
 
 
Those are a lot of interesting points you're raising. 
 
I'd like to highlight your scepsis regarding the desirability of introducing an intermediary component. I think central components have a tendency to become major barriers in innovation in organisations. So your advice to muster great restraint in introducing them sounds very wise to me. Can it be that the fondness to introduce central components is directly correlated to their single defining characteristic: they're involved in everything that transcends the scope of a single project/application/organisational unit and as a result represent power to architects/ISPs/vendors? A more charitable explanation is that they provide a locus to enforce standardisation to prevent maintainance nightmares. 
 
Personally I'm under the impression that a central component should be as lean as possible and play a very commoditised role: it's services should be well understood by the organisation and easy/simple/quick to provide. So that it's like the use of tcp/ip networks in organisations or like the use of commoditised applications (ERP) are meant to be.

 

Via Nova Architectura is not responsible for the content of blogs, but authors and readers are asked to adhere the following guidelines. Authors are strongly encouraged to check facts, cite sources, present balanced views, acknowledge and correct errors. Respect copyright, fair use and financial disclosure laws. Please do not disparage organizations, or individuals. Being critical of someone's practice is acceptable, when it is done in a professional manner. Prevent usage of marketing statements. Comments should be relevant to the specific post they are attached to. Spam, flaming, personal attacks, and off-topic comments are not permitted. Readers are requested to notify This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it of any violations. The editor holds the right to remove any statements that, in the editors opinion, infringe the above guideline(s). The author receives a notification of this action.