• English
  • Nederlands
HOME
ZOEK
CONTACT
NIEUWSBRIEF
 
 
 
INHOUD
Over ons
Over NAF
Bijdragen
Artikeloproep
De CIO spreekt
De Architect antwoordt
De Business bepaalt
Proceedings
Blogs
Scripties
Kalender
Links
Login/Registreer
THEMAS
Effect van architectuur
SOA
BPM
Methoden
Architectuurprincipes
Financiële sector
Overheidssector
Zorg sector
Advertenties
Zoek je een baan?
Zoek je hulp?
Zoek je een opleiding?
Zoek je een tool?


Logica
logo_5fsap.jpg 

 
 
Rijk van Vulpen
New InformationArchitect Ways: Faust and the Devil
zondag, 07 december 2008

What would we information architects give for an elegant or fitting worldview or world knowledge in a business domain? Faust, the protagonist of the book of the same name by Goethe, was willing to give his soul for that. And Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, could know that is the consequence. Besides lawyer, poet, humanist and literature writer he was a scientist with a new research method. A research method we can, in my opinion, use as information architects.

His method is called (goethesian) phenomenology or goetheanism. He developed it in natural-science: the study of plants and the study of colors. And he found fundamental plant patterns with it. His method consists of several phases.

Schrijf als eerste een reactie

meer
 
Architect views by Cubists and Futurists
zondag, 30 november 2008

My colleague Ruud van Vliet has presented the future of the information architect on LAC2008. One of his observations is that an information architect must be able to juggle with many worldviews at the same time. He must see many aspects of a universe of discourse at once, from several angles.

This calls for a holistic view and synthesis processes. But that is easier said than done. Is the human mind capable of doing this? Can I do this by looking swiftly at one aspect in detail, then switching to an other aspect, such that traces of the first view stay in memory for a while? And how do I present and base the results to stakeholders?

Schrijf als eerste een reactie

meer
 
Emotion Representation ;-)
zondag, 26 oktober 2008

‘This is the third day without website and e-mail! Do you guys not understand the consequences of running a business without e-mail these days?!’ Last week I had to call my internet provider for lack of service. And that was not without emotions.

I realized then and there that one of the consequences of entering the conceptual age will be that we have to be able to conceptualize and use emotions. In information systems this will be needed to enhance human-machine interaction but also to reason with it in those systems. As I see it now, that could even become an infrastructural component, as I expect time, accountability en context will also. You need it in that case to represent the emotional feelings related to other data. E.g. to represent ‘Client X is devastated as the bank has made her sell her house’.

Schrijf als eerste een reactie

meer
 
Making sense of complicated domains
zondag, 12 oktober 2008

How will the market model for the energy market develop? How can the youth wellbeing in all its complexity be managed in the Netherlands?

As information architects we aim to arriving somehow at a stable set of principles, domain models or business requirements. But with the complex questions active in the business or organizational architecture, stability is hard to get. And as we are conceptualizers more and more of these questions will hit us hard. We have to be able to define and get hold of these kinds of complex worlds. How do we cope with this?

Schrijf als eerste een reactie

meer
 
Use different worldviews / paradigms
zondag, 05 oktober 2008
In my previous blog I stated that we - knowledge workers and information architects – need to add value in innovative conceptualisations of the real world. A first step to innovative conceptualising is to become aware of your current worldview or paradigm. And to try new ones. I wish you many worldviews.

Schrijf als eerste een reactie

meer
 
From Information Age to the Conceptual Age
zondag, 28 september 2008
We can make the move from the ‘logical layer’ and Zachman’s Designer view, with hard system and logical models and innovations via technology, to the ‘conceptual layer’ in Zachman’s Owner view, with ‘biological’ models.

Schrijf als eerste een reactie

meer