|
|
| |
| |
|
Jack van Hoof
|
Sunday, 20 July 2008 |
|
Don't try to convince system-scale project leaders of enterprise-scale architectural decisions or you will "die". Especially if you don't have good examples at hand. (Should project leaders be "convinced" of architectural decisions at all? Or should there be a "trust" relationship with the employed architects? Comments (2) |
|
more
|
|
|
Wednesday, 02 July 2008 |
|
Looking from the business side, there is the composition of business activities into autonomous business functions. On the other hand there is the composition of application constructs. Be the first to write a comment |
|
more
|
|
|
Wednesday, 02 July 2008 |
|
Imagine a big data warehouse, where all relevant business data is stored. So what? Wait, it is not just simple business data and it also is not just simply stored. No, it is there spontaneously. You don't explicitly model and store the data, it just is there. And the data is the actual real-time representation of all your business activities at this very moment; including all the history of it. Be the first to write a comment |
|
more
|
|
|
Sunday, 29 June 2008 |
"SOA is not about technology", or is it?
Some seem to forget that business is dead without technology. Especially nowadays. Over the ages of mankind technology always has given birth to business. Ignoring technology won't help the business, it murders the business.
Be the first to write a comment |
|
more
|
|
|
Saturday, 28 June 2008 |
Computable publiceerde op 25 juni 2008 een interessante observatie van Ernst Fuld - ...Zelfs datacenters zijn hier over drie jaar weg.
Ik ben het geheel eens met Enst Fuld. Het gaat hier al lang niet meer om een visie, maar om een inzicht. Be the first to write a comment |
|
more
|
|
|
Wednesday, 25 June 2008 |
|
You can obtain decoupling (independency), reliability and performance at the (low) cost of redundant data persistency. When you stick to "calling services" you gain benefits at the level of application construction, but at the cost of higher loads, less predictable performance, scalability issues and higher costs in business level reorganizations.
Comments (3) |
|
more
|
|
|
Via Nova Architectura is not responsible for the content of blogs, but authors and readers are asked to adhere the following guidelines. Authors are strongly encouraged to check facts, cite sources, present
balanced views, acknowledge and correct errors. Respect copyright, fair use and financial disclosure laws. Please do not disparage organizations, or individuals. Being critical of someone's practice is acceptable, when it is done in a professional manner. Prevent usage of marketing statements. Comments should be relevant to the specific post they are attached to. Spam, flaming, personal attacks, and off-topic comments are not
permitted. Readers are requested to notify
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
of any violations. The editor holds the right to remove any statements that, in the editors opinion, infringe the above guideline(s). The author receives a notification of this action.
|
|
|
| |
| |
|