CONTENT
Terug naar community
Magazine
Proceedings
Blogs
Master thesis
Zoeken
THEMES
The CIO speaks
The architect answers
The business decides
Effect of architecture
SOA
BPM
Methods
Principles
Financial services
Public sector
Health sector
Most popular items
 
 
BLOGS
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name:
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question
Written by Danny Greefhorst on 16-03-2008 19:58
 
 
Hi Lydia, 
 
Indeed I think that a lot of confusion stems from the multiple meanings of the term "service". Personally, I like to refer to the ArchiMate terminology that discerns business services, application services and infrastructure services; business services are defined independently of any IT support. Another distinction made in ArchiMate is external versus internal services. External services are exposed to the layer above, whilst internal services are exposed within the same layer (business, application, infrastructure). Services in ArchiMate are primarily aimed to be EA constructs; they show which behavior is exposed from a certain element. This does not automatically imply that it is a service from an integration perspective, and even if it does it's implementation does not have to be a Web Service. And even if the latter does; it does not necessarily map 1-1 onto a specific Web Service. 
 
With respect to ESB; if you think of it as a concept then all application integration can be seen to use the "ESB", independent of whether integration middleware is used. 
 
Regards, 
 
Danny

 

Via Nova Architectura is not responsible for the content of blogs, but authors and readers are asked to adhere the following guidelines. Authors are strongly encouraged to check facts, cite sources, present balanced views, acknowledge and correct errors. Respect copyright, fair use and financial disclosure laws. Please do not disparage organizations, or individuals. Being critical of someone's practice is acceptable, when it is done in a professional manner. Prevent usage of marketing statements. Comments should be relevant to the specific post they are attached to. Spam, flaming, personal attacks, and off-topic comments are not permitted. Readers are requested to notify This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it of any violations. The editor holds the right to remove any statements that, in the editors opinion, infringe the above guideline(s). The author receives a notification of this action.