• English
  • Nederlands
HOME
ZOEK
CONTACT
NIEUWSBRIEF
 
 
 
INHOUD
Over ons
Over NAF
Bijdragen
Artikeloproep
De CIO spreekt
De Architect antwoordt
De Business bepaalt
Proceedings
Blogs
Scripties
Kalender
Links
Login/Registreer
THEMAS
Effect van architectuur
SOA
BPM
Methoden
Architectuurprincipes
Financiële sector
Overheidssector
Zorg sector
Advertenties
Zoek je een baan?
Zoek je hulp?
Zoek je een opleiding?
Zoek je een tool?


Logica
logo_5fsap.jpg 

 
 
Aankondigingen
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Naam:
 
Email
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question
Geschreven door Graham Berrisford op 18-08-2008 20:54
 
 
Sorry to say I find the alignment of ArchiMate to TOGAF in this paper is too superficial. They use similar words (because we have a limited vocabulary of workds like system, function, service, interface) but the meanings given to these words are not consistent within TOGAF and not consistent between TOGAF and Archimate. 
 
At the level of the underlying concepts, of the underlying meta models, the ArchiMate meta model appears to me to be significantly different from the TOGAF meta model, and that is level the work needs to be done.

 
Gerelateerde artikelen