• English
  • Nederlands
HOME
ZOEK
CONTACT
NIEUWSBRIEF
 
 
 
INHOUD
Over ons
Over NAF
Bijdragen
Artikeloproep
De CIO spreekt
De Architect antwoordt
De Business bepaalt
Proceedings
Blogs
Scripties
Kalender
Links
Login/Registreer
THEMAS
Effect van architectuur
SOA
BPM
Methoden
Architectuurprincipes
Financiële sector
Overheidssector
Zorg sector
Advertenties
Zoek je een baan?
Zoek je hulp?
Zoek je een opleiding?
Zoek je een tool?


Logica
logo_5fsap.jpg 

 
 
BLOGS
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Naam:
 
Email
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question
Geschreven door Erik Proper op 26-12-2007 12:18
 
 
n response to 'Furthermore, the "design-oriented perspective" often also serves to regulate lower-level decisions, e.g. in a stepwise refinement, and thus becomes part of the "regulation-oriented perspective".':  
 
This is absolutely right! I believe that moving from architecture to engineering, one will elaborate/refine on each of these three perspectives. At architecture level one will have regulations in the form of architecture principles, design artefacts such as ArchiMate models, and associated patterns. When moving to the engineering level, the regulations perspective will be enriched by general principles of sound engineering (referred to as professional principles as Martin Op't Land), as well as more detailed "engineering" regulations. The design oriented perspective and patterns oriented perspective will obviously also see refinement. 
 
In other words, I think the three perspectives are like three "streams" that should be consistent amongst each other, while being refined when moving from architecting to engineering. 
 
I also have a hypothesis on defining the borderline between architecting and engineering, using a goal-oriented approach .... to be worked out in a future blog entry.

 

Via Nova Architectura is not responsible for the content of blogs, but authors and readers are asked to adhere the following guidelines. Authors are strongly encouraged to check facts, cite sources, present balanced views, acknowledge and correct errors. Respect copyright, fair use and financial disclosure laws. Please do not disparage organizations, or individuals. Being critical of someone's practice is acceptable, when it is done in a professional manner. Prevent usage of marketing statements. Comments should be relevant to the specific post they are attached to. Spam, flaming, personal attacks, and off-topic comments are not permitted. Readers are requested to notify Dit e-mail adres is beschermd door spambots, u heeft Javascript nodig om dit onderdeel te kunnen bekijken of any violations. The editor holds the right to remove any statements that, in the editors opinion, infringe the above guideline(s). The author receives a notification of this action.