CONTENT
Terug naar community
Magazine
Proceedings
Blogs
Master thesis
Zoeken
THEMES
The CIO speaks
The architect answers
The business decides
Effect of architecture
SOA
BPM
Methods
Principles
Financial services
Public sector
Health sector
Most popular items
 
 
BLOGS
Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name:
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question
Written by Peter Bodifée on 28-02-2008 10:22
 
 
The "technology rat-race" wouldn't be such a devastating drain on resources like money, human knowledge and even energy, if the IT world would finally agree on standardization of interfaces. If interfaces would be well-defined and broadly accepted everyone could run at it's own pace with respect to technology refreshes. Not everyone gets a kick out of having the latest and greatest. I take the protocol definitions in the internet space as an example that it is possible to achieve this goal. 
 
So now how do we get to this point? By adopting the "technology independence" principle as stated by TOGAF. In my view the implementation of this principle means that standardization of the interfaces is the road to go. The interfaces then become the structure to hold the technology in place. Replacing individual technology components will not be so disruptive and can therefor be executed at an appropriate moment. 
 
See also my blog post http://www.itarchitecturecoach.com/2008/02/it-standardization-is-result-of.html

 

Via Nova Architectura is not responsible for the content of blogs, but authors and readers are asked to adhere the following guidelines. Authors are strongly encouraged to check facts, cite sources, present balanced views, acknowledge and correct errors. Respect copyright, fair use and financial disclosure laws. Please do not disparage organizations, or individuals. Being critical of someone's practice is acceptable, when it is done in a professional manner. Prevent usage of marketing statements. Comments should be relevant to the specific post they are attached to. Spam, flaming, personal attacks, and off-topic comments are not permitted. Readers are requested to notify This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it of any violations. The editor holds the right to remove any statements that, in the editors opinion, infringe the above guideline(s). The author receives a notification of this action.